@article{oai:nodai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000554,
 author = {安藤, 元一 and 小川 博 and 佐々木 剛 and 大岩 幸太 and Motokazu, Ando and Hiroshi Ogawa and Takeshi Sasaki and Kota Oiwa},
 issue = {2},
 month = {2016-04-20},
 note = {イノシシ肉とブタ肉の味について,大学生を対象とした官能検査を行った。両者を焼き肉の形で比較したところ,柔らかさではブタが,香りではイノシシが勝っていた。イノシシ肉各部位(ロース,バラ,モモ)間に有意な味の差は見られなかったが,夏肉の評価は冬肉よりも有意に低かった。ブタ肉価格を100としたときに,回答者が妥当と思うイノシシ肉の価格は平均112-138,中央位100-120,最頻値80-100の範囲にあった。このようにイノシシ肉とブタ肉の評価額に大きな差は無かったが,イノシシ肉をブタ肉の2～4倍に高く評価した回答者も一部に見られた。回答者の性別による差のみられた項目はなかった。野生動物肉を食べることへの抵抗感はみられなかった。現在のイノシシ肉は家庭消費肉としての価格競争力は有していないので,消費拡大には価格以外の訴求力が必要と思われる。, Quality of wild boar and swine meats were compared through sensory evaluation by university students. While boar meat had a characteristically meaty scent, swine meat was strongly preferred for its softness. There were no qualitative differences in boar meat parts (loin,back rib and thigh). Juicy texture of winter boar meat was superior to dry texture of summer one in most criteria. In general, willingness to pay among respondents for boar and swine meats was roughly the same. Assuming the price of swine meat as 100, appropriate pricing by respondents for various parts of boar meat was 112-138 on average, 100-120 in median, and 80-100 in mode. But some respondents evaluated boar meat as high as high as 400 level. There were no differences in the answer of male and female respondents. Respondents showed no hesitation to eat wildlife meat. For domestic consumption, boar meat seems not to be price-competitive to swine meat. Since there are some people who highly valuate boar meat, appealing to other features of boar meat seems necessary to increase consumption., E, 7, KJ00009434299, 論文, Article},
 pages = {150--156},
 title = {大学生を対象としたイノシシ肉とブタ肉の官能評価},
 volume = {59},
 year = {},
 yomi = {アンドウ, モトカズ and オガワ, ヒロシ and ササキ, タケシ and オオイワ, コウタ}
}